See detailed comparison
When Data Isn’t Decision-Ready
The Investment vs. Reliability Gap Is Real
Run a focus group?
Field a big survey?
Use basic biometrics?
By the numbers
Why Traditional Methods
Fall Short
Focus groups
Surveys & self-report
Basic biometrics
Method
What it promises
What it usually delivers
Where it falters
Focus groups
Deep qualitative feedback
Quotable takeaways
Group dynamics amplify loud voices; results don’t map cleanly to real-world behavior.
Surveys & self-report
Scale + explicit preference
Stated opinions
Recall & social-desirability biases; weak link to in-the-moment reactions.
Basic biometrics
Emotional arousal signals
“Something changed.”
Lacks tight timing/context; hemodynamic/EDA delays blur causality.
Focus groups
What it promises
Deep qualitative feedback
What it usually delivers
Quotable takeaways
Where it falters
Group dynamics amplify loud voices; results don’t map cleanly to real-world behavior.
Surveys & self-report
What it promises
Scale + explicit preference
What it usually delivers
Stated opinions
Where it falters
Recall & social-desirability biases; weak link to in-the-moment reactions.
Basic biometrics
What it promises
Emotional arousal signals
What it usually delivers
“Something changed.”
Where it falters
Lacks tight timing/context; hemodynamic/EDA delays blur causality.
Real-time consumer insights, powered by neuroscience
What this unlocks for you
Sharper creative calls
Faster iteration
Less wasted spend
Emotionally coherent messaging
Better predictability
Solutions you can depend on
Experiment Builder.
Performance Metrics.
EmotivIQ™ (AI Insights).
Participant Management.
Advanced Controls.
Where it fits in your workflow
Case Studies:
Value unlocked
Turning cleaning into emotional engagement
Precision matching for better conversions
Messaging that strengthens connection